Commentary by Timothy Horrigan
In the fall of 2008, I was elected as a New Hampshire State Representative from Strafford County District #7. In the following 2009 session, I introduced just one bill, HB 105: "AN ACT relative to voting machines for the counting of ballots". The first public hearing was at the Legislative Office Building in Concord, NH at 11:30 a.m.; January 21, 2009
Click below to learn about:
Bill Text (also shown below)
Bill's Docket (also shown below)
It basically proposes a simple change which would have major ramifications for restoring trust in the integrity of our electoral system: all ballot counting machines would have to have open source software. It also eliminates references to machines for casting ballots. Currently towns in New Hampshire use computerized "optiscan" ballot boxes which count the ballots as they are cast. These are subjected to a security audit by the Secretary of State's office, and the elections division does compile a white list of approved systems for our state's towns and cities. However, the software for our voting machines is still a proprietary black box which our elections officials are not allowed to see. My intention is that towns could still use their old ballot boxes if they wanted to, but the official vote would have to be done separately, either by hand or by an open-source counting machine with open source software.
We tend to have fairly short ballots in New Hampshire. (We are not like my old home state of Calfiornia, where ballots had dozens of different offices and refererenda on them.) Aside from the federal offices, the only statewide office which is chosen at the ballots is the Governor. We have no Lieutenant Governor, and the other constitutional offices are elected by the state legislature (in consultation with the governor.) We do not have statewide ballot referendums, and Constitutional amendments are fairly rare. Although we have a very large state house of representatives, otherwise we don't have a very large number of elected offices. Towns and cities have a lot of power in New Hampshire, and the municipalities all have a plethora of boards, commitees and commissions, but most of the municipal offices are filled by appointment (or by unanimous consent at Town Meetings.) So it would be practical to count our ballots by hand.
[February 6, 2009] The hearing was on the first day my committee met, on January 21, 2009. About a dozen or so people showed up for the hearing, even though I didn't do that much to publicize it aside from putting up this web page and doing some networking online. I discovered long before the hearing that there weren't really any open-source voting solutions available, so if my bill passed in its original form, we would have to count all our ballots by hand. This would be fine by me, but not by the Secretary of State's office.
The Elections Division is trying to develop something just like what I had in mind: a cheap open-source vote-counting machine. But it is far from being a marketable product: they haven't even built a prototype yet. A few days after my hearing, I attended a meeting at the New Hampshire State Archives hosted by Dr. Ron Rivest, the world's leading expert on open-source voting machinery, a very upbeat and optimistic man who.agreed that my bill was unworkable in its original form. Before the Executive Session, Dave Scanlan from the Elections Divison and I worked up an amendment whoch passed unanimously in commitee. It vitiated the original point of my bill (to mandate open source software) but it made some useful "housekeeping" changes. Those changes were left over from the days when a few cities used lever-type voting machines, but the changes are applicable even today, because they make it clear that towns are free to count ballots by hand and/or to use a separate vote counting machine.
The amended bill was placed on the "Consent Calendar" with a committee report of "Ought to Pass as Amended" or "OTPA", which means that (unless someone unexpectedly moves to put it on the regular calendar) it will be dealt with by voice vote on February 12, 2009 along with a whole bunch of other bills. Except in the case of some rules changes, the full house always votes on committee reports: the most common reports are "ITL" [Inexpedient to Legislate, i.e., "kill it dead and kill it now"], "OTP" [Ought to pass] and OTPA. Usually there is just one report, a majority report, but minorities can send reports too.
There are several other ways of killing a bill other than accepting an ITL report, depending on how dead we want to kill it. In 2008, for example, I testified in favor of HR 24, a bill to impeach Bush II & Cheney which not too surprisingly was sent out of committee with something other a unanimous Ought to Pass report. That bill was ITLed by the majority of the committee with a minority report of OTP. It was finally Laid on the Table by the full house, because the leadership wanted to keep it around just in case Bush II did something even more egregious than what he had already done.
Betty Hall, who sponsored HR24 in 2007 and 2008, is now a lobbyist after losing a State Senate election. She showed up at our Executive Session (where the public can listen in, but is not allowed to comment, unless we ask one of the spectators to comment, which doesn't happen often, although Dave Scanlan did get to answer some questions.) I think Betty was disappointed that I had amended my bill to take out the Open Source part. I am one of the radicals in the House, but I also respect the process: I didn't want to waste my colleague's time on something which wasn't going to fly.
[February 16, 2009] HB105, as amended, passed by a voice vote on February 12, 2009: I wasn't even my seat at the time: I was running around because another election-law bill was unexpectedly going up for a roll call vote. But I was in the hall, and I did get to shout out "Aye."
[April 27, 2009] The Senate also passed HB105, but my State Senator and friend Amanda Merrill made a minor amendment. The bill is not ready to be signed by the governor yet, but I am sure the House will approve her amendment.
[April 29, 2009] The House concurred with the amendment.
[June 11, 2009] The governor signed the bill on June 9, 2010. There was no ceremony or anything of that nature. I didn't even know about till I saw the new line on the bills docket. My bill was added to "Chapter 0070":
CHAPTER 70 HB 105 – FINAL VERSION 12Feb2009… 0129h 04/22/09 1381s 06May2009… 1481eba 2009 SESSION 03/04 HOUSE BILL 105 AN ACT relative to voting machines for the counting of ballots. SPONSORS: Rep. Horrigan, Straf 7 This bill replaces the term "voting machines or devices" with "electronic ballot counting devices." This bill also eliminates references in the voting machine enabling laws to machines or devices for casting ballots. |
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics. Matter
removed from current law appears [ Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type. 12Feb2009… 0129h 04/22/09 1381s 06May2009… 1481eba 09-0433 03/04 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine AN ACT relative to voting machines for the counting of ballots. Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened: 70:1 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend the subdivision heading preceding RSA 656:40 to read as follows: [ 70:2 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices; Adoption and Approval. Amend RSA 656:40 and RSA 656:41 to read as follows: 656:40 Adoption. The
mayor and aldermen of any city or the selectmen of any
town, subject to the approval of the ballot law
commission, may authorize the use of one or more [ 656:41 Approval by Ballot
Law Commission. The ballot law commission shall act as a
board to examine [ 70:3 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend RSA 656:42, I-V to read as follows: I. The ballot law
commission shall make such rules as may be necessary to
ensure the accuracy of [ II. Consistent with the
rules of the ballot law commission the secretary of
state shall include protocols for the testing of [ III. Any company,
partnership, proprietorship, or other person, wherever
located, which supplies, maintains, or programs [ IV. Each person described in paragraph III shall designate, in writing, an agent for service of all process, including, but not limited to summonses, writs, orders, petitions, and subpoenas, and shall agree in writing that the attorney general, in conjunction with any election investigation, may inspect its records, machines or other devices, and premises. V. Any such person
described in paragraph III who fails to properly program
and test [ 70:4 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend RSA 656:43 to read as follows: 656:43 Lease or Purchase.
Any town or city authorizing the use of [ 70:5 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend RSA 659:23, II to read as follows: II. The provisions of
paragraph I shall not apply in cities and towns which
use one or more [ 70:6 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend RSA 659:42 to read as follows: 659:42 Tampering With [ 70:7 Repeal. RSA 656:43-a, relative to voting machine replacement, is repealed. 70:8 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage. Approved: June 9, 2009 Effective Date: August 8, 2009< |
Docket of HB105
Bill Title:
relative to voting machines for the
counting
of ballots.
Official
Docket of HB105:
Date |
Body |
Description |
01/07/2009 |
H |
Introduced 1/7/2009 and Referred to Election Law; HJ 8, PG. 122 |
01/08/2009 |
H |
Public Hearing: 1/21/2009 11:30 AM LOB 308 |
01/21/2009 |
H |
Executive Session: 2/3/2009 1:00 PM LOB 308 |
02/05/2009 |
H |
Committee Report: Ought to Pass with AM #0129h for Feb 12 CC (vote 19-0); HC 11, PG.177 |
02/05/2009 |
H |
Proposed Amendment #0129h; HC 11, PG.206 |
02/12/2009 |
H |
Amendment #0129h Adopted, VV; HJ 17, PG.414-416 |
02/12/2009 |
H |
Ought to Pass with Amendment #0129h: MA VV; HJ 17, PG.414-416 |
03/18/2009 |
S |
Introduced and Referred to Election Law and Veterans' Affairs; SJ 8, pg. 132 |
03/26/2009 |
S |
Hearing; April 7, 2009, Room 101, LOB, 8:30 a.m.; SC17 |
04/15/2009 |
S |
Committee Report; Ought to Pass [04/22/09]; SC20 |
04/22/2009 |
S |
Sen. Merrill Floor Amendment{1381s}, AA, VV; SJ 12, Pg.238 |
04/22/2009 |
S |
Ought to Pass with Amendment{1381s}, MA, VV; OT3rdg; SJ 12, Pg.238 |
04/22/2009 |
S |
Passed by Third Reading Resolution; SJ 12, Pg.242 |
04/29/2009 |
H |
House Concurs with Senate Amendment #1381s (Rep Pierce): MA VV; HJ 37, PG.1476 |
05/06/2009 |
H |
Enrolled Bill Amendment #1481 Adopted; HJ 39, PG.1565 |
05/13/2009 |
S |
Enrolled Bill Amendment #1481 Adopted; SJ 15, Pgs.348-349 |
05/13/2009 |
S |
Enrolled; SJ 15, Pg.347 |
05/20/2009 |
H |
Enrolled; HJ 42, PG.1647 |
06/11/2009 |
H |
Signed by the Governor 06/09/2009; Effective 08/08/2009; Chapter 0070 |
This is what I originally introduced in the House:
HB 105 – AS INTRODUCED 2009 SESSION 03/04 HOUSE BILL 105 AN ACT relative to voting machines for the counting of ballots. SPONSORS: Rep. Horrigan, Straf 7 This bill requires that ballot counting machines use open source software. This bill also eliminates references in the voting machine enabling laws to machines or devices for casting ballots. |
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics. Matter
removed from current law appears [ Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type. 09-0433 03/04 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine AN ACT relative to voting machines for the counting of ballots. Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened: 1 Voting Machines; Adoption and Approval. Amend RSA 656:40 and RSA 656:41 to read as follows: 656:40 Adoption. The
mayor and aldermen of any city or the selectmen of any
town, subject to the approval of the ballot law
commission, may authorize the use of one or more voting
machines or devices for computerized [ 656:41 Approval by Ballot
Law Commission. The ballot law commission shall act as a
board to examine voting machines and devices for
computerized [ 2 Casting Deleted. Amend RSA 656:42, I to read as follows: I. The ballot law
commission shall make such rules as may be necessary to
ensure the accuracy of voting machines or devices,
including rules for the testing of voting machines or
devices prior to each election and the submission of
testing records to the secretary of state. The ballot
law commission shall make such rules as may be necessary
in order that voting machines or devices for
computerized [ 3 Casting and Lever Voting Machines Deleted. Amend RSA 656:43 and RSA 656:43-a to read as follows: 656:43 Lease or Purchase.
Any town or city authorizing the use of a voting machine
or a device for computerized [ 656:43-a Replacement. If
a city or town decides to replace all of its [ 4 Casting Deleted. Amend RSA 659:23, II to read as follows: II. The provisions of
paragraph I shall not apply in cities and towns which
use one or more voting machines or devices for
computerized [ 5 Casting Deleted. Amend RSA 659:42 to read as follows: 659:42 Tampering With
Voting Machines. Whoever shall tamper with or injure or
attempt to injure any voting machine or device for the
computerized [ 6 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage. |
House Calendar Blurb:
The actual floor motion was made on February 12 by Rep. Tim Comerford (R-Kingston), who sits next to me at the committee table. Committee members take turns making the floor motions after bills are reported unanimously (or almost unanimously.)
HB 105, relative to voting machines for the counting of ballots. OUGHT TO PASS WITH AMENDMENT. |
Rep. Timothy P Comerford for Election Law: The committee finds that the original intent of this bill, using open source software in vote counting machines, is not currently feasible. However, notwithstanding the availability of said software, there is merit to the bill as it clears up language in state statutes relative to vote casting devices. The state does not use vote casting devices or lever voting machines. The bill simply removes reference to these devices and puts the RSA in line with current practice. Vote 19-0 |
And this is what we passed:
HB 105 – AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE 12Feb2009… 0129h 2009 SESSION 03/04 HOUSE BILL 105 AN ACT relative to voting machines for the counting of ballots. SPONSORS: Rep. Horrigan, Straf 7 This bill replaces the term "voting machines or devices" with "electronic ballot counting devices." This bill also eliminates references in the voting machine enabling laws to machines or devices for casting ballots. |
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics. Matter
removed from current law appears [ Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type. 12Feb2009… 0129h 09-0433 03/04 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine AN ACT relative to voting machines for the counting of ballots. Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened: 1 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend the section heading preceding RSA 656:40 to read as follows: [ 2 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices; Adoption and Approval. Amend RSA 656:40 and RSA 656:41 to read as follows: 656:40 Adoption. The
mayor and aldermen of any city or the selectmen of any
town, subject to the approval of the ballot law
commission, may authorize the use of one or more [ 656:41 Approval by Ballot
Law Commission. The ballot law commission shall act as a
board to examine [ 3 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend RSA 656:42, I-V to read as follows: I. The ballot law
commission shall make such rules as may be necessary to
ensure the accuracy of [ II. Consistent with the
rules of the ballot law commission the secretary of
state shall include protocols for the testing of [ III. Any company,
partnership, proprietorship, or other person, wherever
located, which supplies, maintains, or programs [ IV. Each person described in paragraph III shall designate, in writing, an agent for service of all process, including, but not limited to summonses, writs, orders, petitions, and subpoenas, and shall agree in writing that the attorney general, in conjunction with any election investigation, may inspect its records, machines or other devices, and premises. V. Any such person
described in paragraph III who fails to properly program
and test [ 4 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend RSA 656:43 to read as follows: 656:43 Lease or Purchase.
Any town or city authorizing the use of [ 5 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend RSA 659:23, II to read as follows: II. The provisions of
paragraph I shall not apply in cities and towns which
use one or more [ 6 Electronic Ballot Counting Devices. Amend RSA 659:42 to read as follows: 659:42 Tampering With
Voting Machines. Whoever shall tamper with or injure or
attempt to injure any [ 7 Repeal. RSA 656:43-a, relative to voting machine replacement, is repealed. 8 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage. |
See Also: