Additional commentary by Timothy Horrigan
(member of the House Petitions & Redress Committee)
Note from Rep. Horrigan: Mr. Donovan brought in no documentation whatsoever (aside from his own brief summary) to the initial hearing on January 31, 2012. He claims he mailed in a voluminous amount of documentation, and he even told the committee on May 3, 2012 how much he paid to mail it. (Nine dollars.) But for whatever reason that documentation is missing from the official file .
For various reasons, I have decided to redact almost the entire petition, and to not reprint his summary. I will just say that there was a dispute over a parenting plan.
PETITION 24
PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE
TO: The
Honorable House of Representatives
FROM: Petitioner
Representative Stephen Schmidt, Carroll 4
DATE: October
17, 2011
SUBJECT: Grievance
of William J. Donovan, III
Your Petitioner Representative S. Schmidt on behalf of William J. Donovan, III, hereinafter presents the following summary of his grievance involving Marital Master Ann Barber [redacted] and invokes the constitutional authority and duty of the Honorable House of Representatives pursuant to Articles 31 and 32 to bring about redress:
Grievance involving Marital Master Ann Barber. who ordered [redacted]
[redacted]
Master Ann Barber refused to acknowledge the findings and recommendations [redacted]
Wherefore, your Petitioner prays that the House of Representatives consider this proposed remedy:
That Marital Master Ann Barber be formally charged with misconduct.
That the House hold a formal hearing to show that Marital Master Ann Barber should be removed from her position.
Respectfully submitted by Petitioner Representative S. Schmidt on Behalf of William J. Donovan, III.
This petition was the first one heard under a new set of (mostly unwritten) rules where complainants (at least those complaining about family-law issues) are not supposed to discuss the personal details of their cases.
At Mr. Donovan's hearing, this new rule made for a somewhat unenlightening discussion on January 31, 2012, since his petition was all about the personal details of his family's case. Mr. Donovan filed the petition in response to a series of allegedly incorrect and injurious decisions made by a certain Marital Master Anne D. Barber, supposedly based on her misunderstanding of the facts of the case. Her name was spelled slightly wrong: her first name is shown in the petition without the "e."
Other 2012 Petitions:
Petition 21: The Ginsberg Petition (on behalf of Arthur Ginsberg of Nashua)
Petition 22: The Joe Haas Petition (on behalf of Joseph Haas)
Petition 23: The Cloutier Petition (on behalf of Bill and Mary Cloutier of Epping)
Petition 24: The Donovan Petition (on behalf of William J. Donovan, III)
Petition 25: The CMC Petition (on behalf of Community Action Group to Save CMC Again)
Petition 26: The Youssef Petition (on behalf of Joshua Youssef)
Petition 27: The Prince Petition (on behalf of Monique Prince)
Petition 28: The Breton Petition (on behalf of Ghislain Breton)
Petition 30: The Capen Petition (on behalf of Bethany Capen)
Petition 32: The Rochester Petition (on behalf of 300-plus citizens of the City of Rochester)
Petition 33: The Nicholas Haas Petition (on behalf of Nicholas Haas of Hooksett)
Petition 34: The Shepard Petition (on behalf of Daniel Shepard of North Hampton)
See Also:
Attorney General Delaney's April 9, 2012 Letter to Speaker Bill O'Brien
Chairman Ingbretson's January 6, 2012 letter to me & some related letters
May 18, 2011 Nashua Telegraph editorial "Let's not confuse the law with ethics"
Official Petitions & Redress committee page (not much to see here)