David W. Johnson's May 25, 2013 NOTICE AND FOREWARNING:  Crimes in the "General Court"

and related writings by various personages, including myself

additional commentary by NH State Rep. Timothy Horrigan; May 28, 2013

See Also:

I do not endorse anything anyone other than myself says on this web page.  Even my own statements should be taken with at least one grain of salt.  The two meaningful legislative actions taken vis a vis the controversial Marital Master Philip Cross did not fail solely on the merits of Mr. Johnson's case.  On the one hand, there were aggrieved parties other than Mr. Johnson who were complaining about Master Cross.  (Those aggrieved parties are not quite as numerous as Mr. Johnson believes, but there is definitely much more to this furore than just Mr. Johnson himself.) On the other hand, two of the three committees which investigated Master Cross's activities issued reports which focused primarily on the technical issue of whether not a marital master can be subjected to impeachment or " bill of address" proceedings.  (The third committee was the House Petitions & Redress of Grievance committee which issued a majority report in August 2012 which sounded like it could have been written by Mr. Johnson himself.)

On May 25, 2013, Mr. Johnson sent the following email to all New Hampshire House members:

Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 14:43:57 -0700
From: David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com>
Subject: NOTICE AND FOREWARNING:  Crimes in the "General Court"
To: "terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us" <terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us>,
 "hreps@leg.state.nh.us" <hreps@leg.state.nh.us>

Attention Representatives,


We have a few serious problems.  STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, is no longer within the reach of the people, which is why there is no process for Petitions for Redress of Grievances in the place formerly known as the "General Court."  The members of this body must stop supporting the present House leadership.


Articles 31 & 32  in the New Hampshire Constitution, Part the First, ( the Bill of Rights) state very clearly:


[Art.] 31. [Meetings of Legislature, for What Purposes.] The legislature shall assemble for the redress of public grievances and for making such laws as the public good may require.

June 2, 1784
Amended 1792 generally rewording sentence and omitting "for correcting, strengthening and confirming the laws."


[Art.] 32. [Rights of Assembly, Instruction, and Petition.] The people have a right, in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their representatives, and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer.


To quote felon "Representative" Lucy Weber: "I just don't see it that way."  "SHALL, PEOPLE, and RIGHT" are explicit terms.  She doesn't "see it that way" because she is either dishonest, incompetent, or a violator of her oath of office, or all three.  Clearly, she is working feverishly to undermine the New Hampshire Constitution.  When the words, "people" (not persons), "shall," and "rights" are used in the constitution, the law of the land, they are not, to quote the progressive liberal Democrats, a "guideline."  Lucy Weber is a disgrace.       


The present leadership in STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, House of Representatives, is in no uncertain terms, a compilation of the most severe of usurpers and interlopers, acting in the commission of high treason against the people.  As long as there are no Petitions for Redress, there is NO GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, PERIOD.  In other words, they're going to follow their oath of office.  As stated before, this isn't about their twisted philosophy.  They might want to do any number of things I don't like, but violating the constitution and their oaths are not negotiable, regardless of their political or philosophical delusion.    


As a felon, Terie Norelli, thwarts the will of the people, as she prevents the Petitions and founded Petitions, most of which demonstrated RECORD and PROOF, in the writings of the Judicial criminals themselves, she and her Rules Committee members, and those who support her, are acting in concert to commit misprision of felony and misprision of treason, as they ALL attempt to obscure the high crimes and abuses perpetrated by the Family Courts under Administrative Director Edwin Kelly. These criminals are harming the people, while Norelli and her accomplices are protecting them from justice.  The Administrative Courts in STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE have proven that their leadership are the lowest of the low.  Norelli is their agent of protection.  These are NOT constitutional courts.  Below is copious and abundant proof that they are not.  They are the perpetrators of trust law fraud, and they do it against our children.  Edwin Kelly's operation is a criminal enterprise, of epic proportion.    



18 USC 4  MISPRISION OF FELONY: Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.


18 USC 2382  MISPRISION OF TREASON:  Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.


Recently, the traitors who supported HB135 brought New Hampshire into the spotlight around the world.  There shall be no end to the actions against them.  The willful arrogance and criminal nature of it's supporters are intolerable and outside the law.  Most certainly, their actions demonstrate a reckless disregard for the people, the law, and their oaths of office.  To add insult to injury, they acted to perpetuate their crimes.    


Squatter Norelli and her fellow conspirators are the very embodiment and meaning of the destruction of our Republic.  They work tirelessly to unravel everything that true patriots died to defend.  In her devious mind, a re-election of a Democrat majority warrants an overthrow of the law.  Wrong. 


My WARNING to the elected Representatives:  The evidence is quite clear, the present "Speaker" and her associates SHALL restore the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to Petitions and subsequent REDRESSES for the crimes done against them by the corrupt Family Courts or they are to be removed.  Their violations shall be addressed by the members of the House, or there shall be criminal complaints.  My message to both the Republicans and the Democrats is also quite clear.  Do NOT consult House Leadership.  They are leading you and the people to demise and destruction.  They are criminals and not to be regarded as anything else.  The criminal complaints shall commence in June of this year if the arrogance and indifference of this House Majority prevails.    


As a gentleman, I am giving you both time and warning.  The time is limited.  There will be no complaint against the "House."  Each individual, specific criminal perpetrator shall be named in their own criminal complaint and listed on-line for the public to see.  Additionally, all BOND and insurance information shall be entered into play.  No one has any right or authority to infringe upon the rights of the living souls on this land we call New-Hampshire.  If you don't act, I shall.  Articles 31 & 32 are above you.  You are not above the law. You are allowing the corrupt courts to destroy our families and our lives. YOU are at fault, if you allow the present leadership to continue to harm the people.  The constitution is a directive, not a guideline.  There are those who abide by the law and the people in Concord.  It is not fair to them to allow criminals to act with impunity against the rest of us, while the faithful refrain from psychotic usurpations.  


Hear of, fail not!  The eradication of Articles 31 & 32 is a crime, a common law crime, a crime against the people, a crime against the State, a crime against the constitution, a crime against their oath of office, and a crime against their own families.  There are three choices:  Get Articles 31 & 32 back, get rid of Norelli and get them back, or get a criminal complaint against you.  Those who are innocent know who they are.  Those who are guilty have until June to fix the problems.  Remember, CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS.  Chuck Douglas can outgas all the nonsense he pleases in the puppet media, in defense of criminals.  It didn't work then and it won't work later.  The New Hampshire BAR is acting in conflict of interest, in violation of the Taft-Hartley Act, the Smith Act, and Article XIII.  They act under the cloak of a secret agenda, and the complete ignorance of the people.    


Example:  The "judge" ( BAR attorney/administrator in a private, corporate court ) is a member of the private NH BAR, the prosecutor is a member of the private BAR, and the attorney who a sucker hired is a member of the same private NH BAR, and they're telling you that you're in a constitutional court?  Only a complete incompetent, ward of the court would believe so.  Read the material below so you can see that their entire operation is a diabolical fraud, and NOTHING ELSE, and that's why Norelli won't allow Petitions.  She is a subjugated puppet for a foreign, criminal enterprise called the Inns of the Court.  All cases in the NH Circuit Courts are concealed contracts.


                                                                                                                          David       


Read below, please. This is why the courts control the present majority. The leaders of the BAR are playing the General Court like fools. Some of the Representatives are unknowing, and some are simply criminals. If the FED is a foreign corporation, who owns it? Right now, the courts do as they damned well please at our peril and expense.


December 26, 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 ( Convention on Rights and Duties of States ) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all STATES under international law.


December 9, 1945, the International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of United States to United Nations.


22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading "Foreign Relationship" states that an oath is required to take office.


Title 8 USC 1481 states once an oath of office is taken, citizenship is relinquished, thus one becomes a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. ( i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign entity )


Title 22 USC ( Foreign relations and Intercourse ) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.


Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states United States is a Federal Corporation and not a government, including the Judicial Procedural Section.


Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( FRCP ) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign state.


The 11th Amendment states "The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of a Foreign State." ( A foreign entity, agency, or state cannot bring any suit against a United States citizen without abiding the following procedure. )


Title 22 CFR 93.1-93.2 states that the Department of State has to be notified of any suit, and in turn has to notify the United States citizen of said suit.


Title 28 USC 1330states that the United States District Court has to grant permission for the suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied sufficient proof that the United States citizen is actually a corporate entity.


Title 28 USC 1608 One has Absolute Immunity as a Corporation.


Title 28 USC 1602-1611 ( Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ) allows the jurisdiction of a court to be challenged, and a demand of proper jurisdiction to be stated.


July 27, 1868, 15 Statutes at Large Chapter 249 Section 1 "Acts Concerning American Citizens in a Foreign State," expatriation, is what is broken when jurisdiction is demanded, and is not met with an answer.


Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12b 6, the prosecution has failed to provide adequate proof that the parties involved in this situation are actually corporate entities. There is ample proof that the prosecution and other agents are actually corporations.


In 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.


In 1933, elected officials and the alleged "country" have been given to the United Nations Government system. Under Senator Barack Hussein Obama's Bill, SB2433, the Poverty Act of 2007, the UN military forces can step on American soil to confiscate weapons from U.S. citizens. Under the Bush Administration, B.A.R. Attorney General Ashcroft and Haliburton established FEMA Concentration Camps for U.S. citizens who refuse the new world order/one world government.


"That the Pan American treaty of 12-26-1933 (49 STAT 3097) Treaty Series 881 – (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all states under international law.


That the International Organization Immunities Act of 12-9-1945 – - Congress relinquished every public office over to the UN. Local governments up to the president fall under UN jurisdiction. Congress gave the UN the right to dictate what laws will be international & gave them the right to tax the States.


That the International Reorganization Rescind Act- Congress put this into form but they never took action to rescind the act. Fairly recently an Ohio judge filed suit claiming that Congress did not have the right to relinquish government authority over to the UN (a corporation or foreign country) and that the Congressional act was a constitutional violation because they didn't put it to the States or the people to agree on it. In 2005 the US Supreme court declined to hear the case therefore all public offices are under UN jurisdiction & they are not American Citizens.


That the Oath of Office – Title 5 USC 331, 332, 333 backed up by Title 22 CFR Foreign Relations 92.12 – 92.31 and Title 8 USC, section 1481 – the public official relinquishes his national citizenship and are thus foreign agents as stipulated under Title 22 USC, chapter 11, section 611, loss of national citizenship – Public officials are no longer US Citizens, but rather are foreign agents and must register as such.


That Title 8 USC 1481 stated once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus you become a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign entity)


That Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.


Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states that the United States is a Federal Corporation and not a Government, including the Judiciary Procedural Section.


That the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign State.


That 28 USC CHAPTER 176 - FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE

The Federal Debt Collection Procedure places all courts under equity and commerce and under the International Monetary Fund."



Since the foreigners in D.C. are in fact foreigners, they are exempt from government employee taxation and the "laws."




[Cut and Paste of Wikipedia article "International Organizations Immunities Act" deleted for sake of clarity and to save space]


JFK tells you what's happening.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GR5m1-5ksj0

Note from Rep. Horrigan: Mr. Johnson also inserted the Wikipedia article "International Organizations Immunities Act" in this email.   I deleted the article for the sake of clarity but see:

As far as I know, neither Mr. Johnson nor myself has edited this article. The article itself seems to be totally accurate, although Mr. Johnson's theories are totally unorthodox.

Mr. Johnson followed this email up with a second one.  The video he mentions is not actually about Speaker Terie Norelli.

Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 19:18:53 -0700
From: David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com>
Subject: Start at 6:40 in the video below,
 you'll hear what Norelli is doing to New Hampshire.
To: "hreps@leg.state.nh.us" <hreps@leg.state.nh.us>,
 "terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us" <terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us>

Starting at 6:40 in the video below, you'll hear what Norelli is doing to the people of New Hampshire.  She is protecting the corrupt Family Court frauds from justice. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5g8Hzb8mQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Rep. Bob Perry replied:

Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 07:39:27 -0400
Subject: Re: Start at 6:40 in the video below,
 you'll hear what Norelli is doing to New Hampshire.
From: Bob Perry <bob.perry@leg.state.nh.us>
To: David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com>
Cc: "hreps@leg.state.nh.us" <hreps@leg.state.nh.us>,
 "terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us" <terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us>

Mr. Johnson,


Each of us has his/her own perspective on life and all the elements within.  If you must publicly disparage her based on your own perspectives, please refer to her as Speaker Norelli.  Thanks.

I chimed in:

Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 12:36:27 -0400
From: Timothy Horrigan <timothyhorrigan@mac.com>
Reply-to: Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu
To: Bob Perry <bob.perry@leg.state.nh.us>
Cc: David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com>,
 "hreps@leg.state.nh.us" <hreps@leg.state.nh.us>,
 "terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us" <terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us>
Subject: Re: Start at 6:40 in the video below,
 you'll hear what Norelli is doing to New Hampshire.

Just to save time, Mr. Johnson sent us a link to a video of various performers reciting the Declaration of Independence.  The 6:40 mark is where Michael Douglas recites:  "In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Mr. Johnson evidently sees a parallel between this paragraph and his own personal history, which includes several House petitions. Speaker Norelli has not obstructed his right to petition: under her watch, he was able to file the first two of his three petitions.  He used a procedure which was created at the beginning of her second term as Speaker, and which is in fact still in place.  He also was able to bring a bill of address in 2010 against a marital master and one of the many judges who have worked on his highly conflicted and protracted divorce proceedings.  None of these three efforts had the desired results, but that was due to the merits of his case.  He was able to make his case on multiple occasions. 

The third of his three House petitions was filed during Speaker O'Brien's term, and that one went to the now-defunct Redress of Grievances Committee which existed during the 2011-2012 biennium.  A majority of the committee did eventually place a positive report on his petition in the House Calendar.  Unfortunately,  they waited till late August 2012, long past the point where any meaningful action could be taken based on their findings. Before then, however, the House Judiciary did in 2011 formally consider impeachment proceedings against the same marital master and judge who were the subject of the 2010 bill of address proceedings (as well as other officials.)

--Timothy Horrigan

Mr. Johnson was, not too surprisingly, incensed by my reply, even though I made it as bland as possible:

Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 12:39:27 -0700
From: David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com>
Subject: Response to Timothy Horrigan's insulting misrepresentations
To: "Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu>,
 "bob.perry@leg.state.nh.us" <bob.perry@leg.state.nh.us>,
 "hreps@leg.state.nh.us" <hreps@leg.state.nh.us>,
 "terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us" <terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us>

Response below in red.   At the bottom of this page is what removes ALL DOUBT. 



From: Timothy Horrigan <timothyhorrigan@mac.com>
To: Bob Perry <bob.perry@leg.state.nh.us>
Cc: David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com>; "hreps@leg.state.nh.us" <hreps@leg.state.nh.us>; "terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us" <terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: Start at 6:40 in the video below, you'll hear what Norelli is doing to New Hampshire.


1.)  Just to save time, Mr. Johnson sent us a link to a video of various performers reciting the Declaration of Independence.  The 6:40 mark is where Michael Douglas recites:  "In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

2.)  Mr. Johnson evidently sees a parallel between this paragraph and his own personal history, which includes several House petitions. Speaker Norelli has not obstructed his right to petition: under her watch, he was able to file the first two of his three petitions.  He used a procedure which was created at the beginning of her second term as Speaker, and which is in fact still in place.  He also was able to bring a bill of address in 2010 against a marital master and one of the many judges who have worked on his highly conflicted and protracted divorce proceedings.  None of these three efforts had the desired results, but that was due to the merits of his case.  He was able to make his case on multiple occasions.  


The rest of what's missing in paragraph "2.)"


House Addresses 1 & 2 were scuttled by the House Majority Democrats.  The facts, meaning the actual recorded court records, including the criminal evidence in the writing of the "judges" themselves, was covered and obscured with misrepresentations by House Democrats.  


When a BAR attorney, masquerading as a marital master or judge, perpetrates fraud, commits felonies and perjury, which alters the outcome of a case, so as to protect another BAR attorney, and harm the people/victims, then the Democrats make the insulting and misleading assertion that the "victims" didn't like the outcome of the cases of House Addresses, that is a reprehensible slap in the face to the victims and their families.  The marital master held a criminal contempt hearing, lied and called it civil contempt, then the supervising judge jailed the father with the majority of the custodial time to pay money that he never had, not rightfully owed.  This is all done so that the BAR attorneys can perpetrate TITLE IV-D Social Security fraud.  Additionally, the HHS Ombudsman's investigation proved the marital master and judge were lying, then they kept the investigative report from entering the evidence, because they're corrupt.  That is just one of dozens of abuses, and just one of the not so clever lies that you just read from Timothy Horrigan.  Intellectual dishonesty is exactly why Norelli chose Keans, Daler, and Horrigan to be on that committee.  It takes someone who can look at black and call it white to allow continued abuses against children.


Do not make the tragic error of listening to anything that is reported by Timothy Horrigan.  Of all the Petitions filed before the Redress Committee, and all their damning evidence, which include the incriminating evidence by the writings of the judges themselves, of lies perpetrated before witnesses who are State Representatives, Timothy Horrigan voted against every victim except one.  The minority reports written by Sandra Keans were sophomoric lies.


House Bill 1543, intended to reimplement the lawful, constitutional process under the Articles 31 & 32, Norelli made sure her House Judiciary Committee killed the Bill.  Timothy Horrigan acts so as to commit misprision of felony and misprision of treason, while protecting the perpetrators of the crimes, the judges and marital masters.  Terie Norelli has no intention of stopping the abuses.  She has no intention of allowing the lawful rights of the people after they've been abused by agents of STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.  

3.)  The third of his three House petitions was filed during Speaker O'Brien's term, and that one went to the now-defunct Redress of Grievances Committee which existed during the 2011-2012 biennium.  A majority of the committee did eventually place a positive report on his petition in the House Calendar.  Unfortunately,  they waited till late August 2012, long past the point where any meaningful action could be taken based on their findings. Before then, however, the House Judiciary did in 2011 formally consider impeachment proceedings against the same marital master and judge who were the subject of the 2010 bill of address proceedings (as well as other officials.)

Response to 3.)  The Redress Committee is "defunct."  The Redress Committee was purposefully dismantled by Norelli, then misrepresented by Lucy Weber and BAR attorney Gary Richardson.  


Did the Democrat House Majority leadership take those founded petitions and the Redress Committee, improve the Committee and redress the victims?  NO!  They chose to violate their oaths of office, deny the people their rights, protect the criminals in the Family Division, then lied about everything. 


The problem is that Norelli is not allowing the redress for the victims.  She is not stopping the Family Court corruption.  She is in breach of her oath and contract with the people.  In Articles 31 & 32, you can see three key words: SHALL, PEOPLE, and RIGHTS.  Lucy Weber "I don't see it that way."  I would never use her words for any kind of cogent argument. 


Sorry, the B.S. is harming people.  The abuses are continuing.  The Democrats are screwing the victims, which includes the court victims who are also Democrats.  This is a reckless disregard for the law, and the constitution, and their oath of offices.  


Most Democrats are not radical usurpers.  Their leadership is!  Where are the redresses?  Where are the founded petitions?  Where are the Democrats taking action against the corrupt family division agents in STATE OF?  


I'm going to file criminal complaints against the leadership, and all who support them.  My last message was to provide warning.  


I'm not going to change my mind because the radical end of the social, progressive usurpers choose to allow abuses against the people to continue.  


Articles 31 & 32, read them, and read them, and search the repetitions.  NEVER, EVER, trust anything that comes from Sandra Keans, Lucy Weber, Timothy Horrigan, or Terie Norelli.  They all allow the abuses of the courts to harm the people.  They MUST lie, or their case would fall flat, where it belongs.  


I'm going to conclude in this manner.  The House leadership are making complete disgraces of themselves.  I'm sick and tired of watching people get hurt because they want to be sock puppets for the NH BAR.  These courts are hurting children.  They violate the law.  They violate the constitution.  THEY HURT KIDS!  Nothing is worse than a criminal who hurts kids for money, except the House leadership who protects those who do.  


There are going to be criminal complaints.  Fix the problem.  Stop looking to your leadership.  They're criminals.  I'm not here for approval.  I'm here to stop this abusive mentality.  We have the proof we need.  This is a wake up call.  B.S.ing is NOT going to work.  


***********


Tim Horrigan, you ought to be ashamed of yourself.  I'm not proud to know you.  I was thrilled to see you on that committee.  You proved me to be mistaken.  I had no idea that being a Democrat meant you had to side in with the self-incriminated, corrupt courts.  Those petitioners were hurt badly by court corruption.  You threw them under the bus.  You and your leadership are misanthropic disgraces to humanity.  You hurt my little girl by protecting criminals.  I would NEVER protect criminals who hurt kids.  


You can turn your heart toward truth, but you don't.


                                                                       David    

And finally, someone named Andy Stachura (who like Mr. Johnson is a party to a longrunning child-custody case) chimed with this:

Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 22:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andy Stachura <andy.stachura@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [daddnh] Response to Timothy Horrigan's insulting
 misrepresentations
To: "timothy. horrigan@alumni. usc. edu" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu>,
 "bob.perry@leg.state.nh.us" <bob.perry@leg.state.nh.us>,
 "Hreps@leg. state. nh. us" <hreps@leg.state.nh.us>,
 "terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us" <terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us>,
 "dwjoae@yahoo com" <dwjoae@yahoo.com>

David, that is exactly what I recall and witnessed as well. Once again Timothy Horrigan has misrepresented the facts and has lied right to the faces of the people of NH. He's apparently a pathological liar, who is doing a piss poor job of covering up criminal activity and official corruption within our government which makes him an accessory.

Andy Stachura




See Also: