On May 11,
2011,
David Johnson filed 4 commercial affidavits with the family
division
of the Franklin, NH circuit court. This is part of his
long-running
child custody case, "In
the Matter of [Ex-Wife's
Name Redacted]and
David Johnson, 2000-M-0407."
(Yes, the "2000" in the docket number does mean the case
was first filed in the year 2000.)
Commercial
affidavits or "Affidavits of truth" are a favorite
stratagem of people who consider themselves "sovereign
citizens." Johnson's affidavits are an attempt to
unilaterally replace the laws of the state of New Hampshire
(as they
have been applied to his situation) with something called
"Commercial
Law" (which supposedly "is based upon certain eternally
just, valid, and moral Precepts and Truths, which have
remained
unchanged for at least six thousand years, having its roots in
Mosaic
Law.") The phrase "Commercial Law" does not quite mean
the same thing to the sovereign-citizen crowd as it does to
mainstream lawyers, judges and businesspeople.
Someone— it is
unclear
who— is expected under Commercial Law to challenge David's
allegations "point for point." If they fail to do so, then
David's side of the story will (ostensibly) have been tacitly
established in its entirety as "Truth in Commerce."
I can see a few possible flaws in this strategy, beginning
with
the basic fact there are already thousands of pages of legal
documents related to the dispute. Each one of those documents
has
least as much claim to validity as these four affidavits. The
previous documents may not be labeled "affidavits of truth"—
and not everything in them is actually true— but each document
is a
sincere (or insincere, as the case may be) expression of what
one
party or another's version of the "truth" happened to be.
To the best of
my
knowledge, as of November 2011, neither [Ex-Wife's
Name Redacted],
Marital Master Philip Cross, Guardian Ad Litem Bruce Wechsler,
nor
anyone else involved in David Johnson's case has, bothered to
file
even an incomplete "rebuttal Affidavit of Truth"— let
alone one which completely rebuts each and every point. Many
of his
points would be impossible for any of the parties to rebut or
confirm.
On September 8,
2011, an administrator from the court system came to testify
before
the House Petitions & Redress Committee, and he provided
us with
copies of the docket for Johnson vs. Johnson. This docket ran
to 42
printed pages with 588 motions filed (and counting.) These
affidavits
were the 585thmotion; the 586thwas a request a month later
by
David Johnson for a summary judgement. His request was denied.
In any event,
these four affidavits are of special interest because they
comprehensively outline Johnson's side of a dispute which has
so far
has led to three of his own House Petitions, a fourth House
Petition filed by a friend of his, a set of Bill
of Address hearings in 2010, multiple court cases, and
all sorts
of other uproar. There is doubtless more uproar to come in the
future.
In The Matter of [Ex-Wife's
Name
Redacted] and David Johnson
2000-M-0407
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
Whereas The Eternal And Unchanging Principles Of The Laws Of
Commerce Are:
A matter must
be expressed to be resolved.
In Commerce,
Truth is sovereign:
Truth is
expressed in the form of an Affidavit.
An unrebutted
Affidavit stands as Truth in Commerce.
An unrebutted
Affidavit becomes the judgement in Commerce.
An Affidavit
of Truth, under Commercial Law, can only be satisfied:
through a
rebuttal Affidavit of Truth, point for point,
by
payment,
by
agreement,
by
resolution by a jury by the rules of Common Law.
All are equal
under the Common Law.
The foundation of Commercial Law is based upon certain eternally
just, valid, and moral Precepts and Truths, which have remained
unchanged for at least six thousand years, having its roots in
Mosaic
Law. Said Commercial Law forms the underpinnings of Western
Civilization, if not all Nations, Law, and Commerce in the world.
Commercial Law is non-judicial, and is prior to and superior to,
the
basis of, and cannot be set aside Or overruled by the statutes of
any
Governments, Legislatures, Governmental, or Quasi- Governmental
agencies, Courts, Judges, and law enforcement agencies, which are
under an inherent obligation to uphold said Commercial Law.
KNOW ALL MEN, THAT I CERTIFY IN THIS AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH THAT THE
FOLLOWING FACTS ARE TRUE, CORRECT, AND COMPLETE:
I, David Johnson, Pro Se, the undersigned, do solemnly swear and
affirm, declare, attest, and depose:
That I am of lawful age and am competent to make this
Affidavit.
That I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
That I am not under the lawful guardianship or disability of
another.
This sworn Affidavit is made as a matter of record of my own
right, pro se, in my own proper status, propia persona.
The "secret" sealed envelope represents an egregious abuse of
my rights to confront any alleged evidence or witness against
me and my parental rights.
Nowhere in any stipulations or contract with G.A.L Bruce
Wechsler does it state that I saw a secret, sealed envelope
which could contain absolutely anything, any untruth, false
allegation, unsubstantiated claim, false testimony,
misrepresentation, mischaracterization, or harm done by
another to me or the child, to be submitted to the Court
without my ability and my right under the Constitution to
protect my rights as a parent.
The presence of this envelope and this policy represents a
clear and present danger to the safety and well being to my
rights as a parent and my family,.most especially my daughter.
It was accepted with all the other hearsay, without one single
witness.
G.A.L. Wechsler became belligerent and combative when I
confronted him with the facts that I caught him lying and
misrepresenting the statements of my daughter's PCP.
Wechsler became extremely manipulative and distant after I
filed a couple of Motions for Contempt for willfully
disobeying the Court Order for him to find a therapist for the
Child.
Wechsler went many months in his failure to find a therapist
for the Child.
Attorney Werme confronted Wechsler, on this issue. It is our
belief that Wechsler had every intention of stalling so he
could show up in Court as the "one and only voice of the
child" in that there would be no therapist to testify.
In desperation to end this manipulation, I hired a therapist
and it took less than one day.
Each and every time a therapist testified or wrote to the
Court against [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted], the Court
allowed [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] to fire the
therapists.
The Court refused to allow the reports of the NH DCYF and the
HHS Ombudsman, Dr. William Brehm, because they showed clearly
that the mother was causing multiple problems for our daughter
and that I was the one clearing up the problems by seeking the
proper treatment, as the Court claimed it was because the HHS
and DCYF officials were not there at the hearing.
When I subpoenaed the DCYF and Dr. Brehm to Court for the
next hearing, the Court did not allow them to testify or be
there for proof of testimony for their reports which
conflicted sharply against the claims of [Ex-Wife's Name
Redacted] and the Court.
The manufactured complications of [Ex-Wife's Name
Redacted] and the Court could be circumvented if the
G.A.L could be allowed to prevent the exposure of all the
damaging evidence and documentation at the next trial, which
was requested by me.
Wechsler requested that the Court not look back more than
eighteen months to all that which the Court was trying to
desperately to distance.
Wechsler was granted the request.
At the trial, Wechsler was allowed to enter hearsay and
allegations against me from years before the bogus eighteen
month rule.
At the trial, Wechsler put forth his allegations which were
one hundred percent hearsay, not one independent witness, no
substantiation to any of his claims, falsified statements and
omitted from my witnesses, claims which were based upon
absolute lies about my relationship with my daughter, and he
got totally derailed in Court during my questioning and my
testimony.
Wechsler entered an envelope which I have not been able to
review, causing more alienation between my daughter and I.
Wechsler got caught lying by Representative Ingbretson about
visitation communication, and supporting [Ex-Wife's Name
Redacted]'s bogus claim for why she wouldn't allow me
to see my daughter.
Wechsler got caught lying by Representative Baldasaro as he
tried to back-peddle on the supervision issue as he supported
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] for refusing to allow him
to watch over my daughter and I, even though my daughter did
know and like "Al "
In another case, Wechsler entered as evidence, "hearsay" from
an interview with a woman in Londonderry, who will come
forward to state that she never had a conversation with him.
Wechsler's input, from start to finish, including the
illegitimate secret sealed envelope, as it must be replete
with the same types of misrepresentations that are throughout
everything Wechsler contributed to this case, must be stricken
from the entire record.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] through counsel objected
to me viewing the envelope's contents, just as her counsel
objected to the DCYF and Ombudsman's reports.
After [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] and Attorney Jon
Ross viewed a hospital file showing that I picked up our
daughter with another neglected infection, antibiotics
prescribed, and the symptoms, she sat silently as Attorney
Ross stated, "Your Honor, there was no infection. The test
results were negative. Mr. Johnson exaggerated the problem."
Jon Ross withdrew after Attorney Werme sent a letter to the
PCC [Professional Conduct Committee].
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] didn't want Wechsler to
contend with the entire history at trial, or for the DCYF and
Ombudsman's Reports, for me to see our daughter, or now for me
to see inside of the controversial envelope.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] and Wechsler want me to
seek a psychological evaluation.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
New Hampshire, that the foregoing, to the best of my knowledge, is
true, correct and complete.
Dated: 5/11/11
Affidavit #2:
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Franklin Family Division, Merrimack County
In The Matter of [Ex-Wife's
Name
Redacted] and David Johnson
2000-M-0407
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
Whereas The Eternal And Unchanging Principles Of The Laws Of
Commerce Are:
A matter must
be expressed to be resolved.
In Commerce,
Truth is sovereign:
Truth is
expressed in the form of an Affidavit.
An unrebutted
Affidavit stands as Truth in Commerce.
An unrebutted
Affidavit becomes the judgement in Commerce.
An Affidavit
of Truth, under Commercial Law, can only be satisfied:
through a
rebuttal Affidavit of Truth, point for point,
by
payment,
by
agreement,
by
resolution by a jury by the rules of Common Law.
All are equal
under the Common Law.
The foundation of Commercial Law is based upon certain eternally
just, valid, and moral Precepts and Truths, which have remained
unchanged for at least six thousand years, having its roots in
Mosaic
Law. Said Commercial Law forms the underpinnings of Western
Civilization, if not all Nations, Law, and Commerce in the world.
Commercial Law is non-judicial, and is prior to and superior to,
the
basis of, and cannot be set aside Or overruled by the statutes of
any
Governments, Legislatures, Governmental, or Quasi-Governmental
agencies, Courts, Judges, and law enforcement agencies, which are
under an inherent obligation to uphold said Commercial Law.
KNOW ALL MEN, THAT I CERTIFY IN THIS AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH THAT THE
FOLLOWING FACTS ARE TRUE, CORRECT, AND COMPLETE:
I, David Johnson, Pro Se, the undersigned, do solemnly swear and
affirm, declare, attest, and depose:
That I am of lawful age and am competent to make this
Affidavit.
That I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
That I am not under the lawful guardianship or disability of
another.
This sworn Affidavit is made as a matter of record of my own
right, pro se, in my own proper status, propia persona.
The Child Support Order was written in the most abusive
manner in conflict with the State and Federal Child Support
Guidelines.
In violation of Federal Funding law, the Div of Support
Enforcement, and the Family Division has been enforcing
support and an arrearage based upon that Order.
When I had 65% of the parenting time and all the bills never
enforced, made by [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted], and all
expenses of the Child including the school and daycare paid by
me, including during [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted]'s
parenting time, I was ordered to pay support and arrearage.
Master Cross held a hearing for the elements of criminal
contempt, called it a civil contempt hearing, denying me a
trial by jury in the Superior Court, and jailed my with the
help of Judge Sadler for nearly 10 weeks.
"Bail" was set and lowered by Judge Sadler when there is no
bail for civil contempt, and she circumvented US Supreme Court
Ruling in Hicks vs. Feiock by claiming I had.
Sadler claimed I had the ability to pay because I could
borrow the money from my sister.
Judge Sadler ignored repeated Motions from Attorney Werme for
Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law and requests for
clarifications were ignored.
Master Cross acknowledged my income was the same as [Ex-Wife's
Name Redacted]'s, yet ignored the fact that the Child
was with me most of the time, yet retaliated against me by
ordering me to pay support when the guidelines demonstrated
otherwise.
Even though the NH Supreme Court ruled in Miller vs. Todd against Master Cross for
similar abuses to my Case, he continues to this day to commit
similar violations as revealed in new Petitions in the General
Court.
My daughter and I have suffered tremendously for the
financial burdens caused by the forced sale of our home,
illegal incarceration, and now an arrearage which is
unsustainable and untenable.
I suffered financial trouble and then severe and debilitating
repair costs to my vehicle preventing me from working
throughout the winter months.
I was paying the support until the financial and
transportation disaster hit me which prevented me from getting
anywhere in the rural/residential area where I live, that is
walking distance from nowhere and there is no public
transportation there.
I have found work. It will be enough to sustain me and after
a reasonable amount of time allow me to re-continue my support
payments.
Was was willing to pay as I did, but I was unable.
Today I am willing and will be able by the end of this month
[presumably, May 2011] to resume payments.
The amount of the payments must be modified to accommodate
the changes for my daughter and I.
Any attempt to jail me will simply foil all my efforts to
comply with the Order and will be counterproductive as well as
thwart my ability to pay.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
New Hampshire, that the foregoing, to the best of my knowledge, is
true, correct and complete.
Dated- 5/11/11
Affidavit #3:
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Franklin Family Division, Merrimack County
In The Matter of [Ex-Wife's
Name
Redacted] and David Johnson
2000-M-0407
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
Whereas The Eternal And Unchanging Principles Of The Laws Of
Commerce Are:
A matter must
be expressed to be resolved.
In Commerce,
Truth is sovereign:
Truth is
expressed in the form of an Affidavit.
An unrebutted
Affidavit stands as Truth in Commerce.
An unrebutted
Affidavit becomes the judgement in Commerce.
An Affidavit
of Truth, under Commercial Law, can only be satisfied:
through a
rebuttal Affidavit of Truth, point for point,
by
payment,
by
agreement,
by
resolution by a jury by the rules of Common Law.
All are equal
under the Common Law.
The foundation of Commercial Law is based upon certain eternally
just, valid, and moral Precepts and Truths, which have remained
unchanged for at least six thousand years, having its roots in
Mosaic
Law. Said Commercial Law forms the underpinnings of Western
Civilization, if not all Nations, Law, and Commerce in the world.
Commercial Law is non-judicial, and is prior to and superior to,
the
basis of, and cannot be set aside Or overruled by the statutes of
any
Governments, Legislatures, Governmental, or Quasi-Governmental
agencies, Courts, Judges, and law enforcement agencies, which are
under an inherent obligation to uphold said Commercial Law.
KNOW ALL MEN, THAT I CERTIFY IN THIS AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH THAT THE
FOLLOWING FACTS ARE TRUE, CORRECT, AND COMPLETE:
I, David Johnson, Pro Se, the undersigned, do solemnly swear and
affirm, declare, attest, and depose:
That I am of lawful age and am competent to make this
Affidavit.
That I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
That I am not under the lawful guardianship or disability of
another.
This sworn Affidavit is made as a matter of record of my own
right, pro se, in my own proper status, propia persona.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] is in contempt of the
Court Order because she decided to terminate the visits
between our daughter and I for no valid, lawful reason.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] violated the Court Order
stating my visitation schedule with our daughter by refusing
to cooperate with Representative Ingbretson and I, refusing to
allow me to see our daughter, as she stated to him that she
will not allow any more visits.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] did not have any fear of
imminent danger to our daughter and she did not introduce any
pleadings with the Court to make such a claim.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] committed a misdemeanor in
violation of RSA 633:4 as she prevented our daughter
from seeing me in an interference of freedom.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] has been in contempt of
the Court Orders several times in the past when she disagreed
with the Court ordered parenting schedule at holiday time,
upon my release from my illegal incarceration, and when she
would decided to stiff Representative Ingbretson and I after
he travelled over two hours to supervise the visits.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] refused to cooperate with
Representative Baldasaro and I for him to supervise the visits
costing our daughter and I hundreds of visits, therefor
causing Representative Ingbretson 4-5 hour round trips to and
from his home. [Johnson doesn't mention the fact that
Ingbretson runs a successful business which is located in
Manchester, the next town over from Londonderry.]
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] refused to allow
Representative Baldasaro to be the supervisor because she
didn't like that he sponsored my Petition for Redress in the
General Court against the Derry Family Division for dozens of
egregious abuses and violations of law.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] did approve of
Representative Ingbretson, even though his is Chairman of the
Redress Committee and was Chairman of the Redress Caucus which
heard the first Petitions against the Derry Family Division,
therefor totally invalidating her claim against Representative
Baldasaro.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] has always been routinely
up to an hour or more late whether she was picking up or
dropping off our daughter.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] has kept our daughter out
of her school to make sure I couldn't get her on my scheduled
days.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted], to this day, stands in
open defiance of the Court Order, in contempt, in violation of
RSA 633:4.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] has committed the case
history long abuses, parental, alienation, interference of
freedom hundreds of times, despite repeated Motions for
Contempt by me, without one single action against her by the
Court, leaving our daughter to endure the torment.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted]'s behavior allowance, with
the help of her pro bono Attorney, got me jailed for almost
ten weeks for a bogus child support Order, when she had much
less than fifty percent of the parenting time, in violation of
Federal and State child support guidelines, and in absence of
the Child Support Guidelines worksheets, which seriously
traumatized our daughter and I and our.relationship. I haven't
talked to my lovely daughter in over a year.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
New Hampshire, that the foregoing, to the best of my knowledge, is
true, correct and complete.
Dated: 5/11/11
Affidavit #4:
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Franklin Family Division, Merrimack County
In The Matter of [Ex-Wife's
Name
Redacted] and David Johnson
2000-M-0407
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
Whereas The Eternal And Unchanging Principles Of The Laws Of
Commerce Are:
A matter must
be expressed to be resolved.
In Commerce,
Truth is sovereign:
Truth is
expressed in the form of an Affidavit.
An unrebutted
Affidavit stands as Truth in Commerce.
An unrebutted
Affidavit becomes the judgement in Commerce.
An Affidavit
of Truth, under Commercial Law, can only be satisfied:
through a
rebuttal Affidavit of Truth, point for point,
by
payment,
by
agreement,
by
resolution by a jury by the rules of Common Law.
All are equal
under the Common Law.
The foundation of Commercial Law is based upon certain eternally
just, valid, and moral Precepts and Truths, which have remained
unchanged for at least six thousand years, having its roots in
Mosaic
Law. Said Commercial Law forms the underpinnings of Western
Civilization, if not all Nations, Law, and Commerce in the world.
Commercial Law is non-judicial, and is prior to and superior to,
the
basis of, and cannot be set aside Or overruled by the statutes of
any
Governments, Legislatures, Governmental, or Quasi-Governmental
agencies, Courts, Judges, and law enforcement agencies, which are
under an inherent obligation to uphold said Commercial Law.
KNOW ALL MEN, THAT I CERTIFY IN THIS AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH THAT THE
FOLLOWING FACTS ARE TRUE, CORRECT, AND COMPLETE:
I, David Johnson, Pro Se, the undersigned, do solemnly swear and
affirm, declare, attest, and depose:
That I am of lawful age and am competent to make this
Affidavit.
That I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
That I am not under the lawful guardianship or disability of
another.
This sworn Affidavit is made as a
matter of record of my own right, pro se, in my own proper status,
propia persona.
The custodial or parenting arrangement must be changed
because [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] has demonstrated
that over the last two years, her abuses have been exactly the
same and worse than when she had custody in the very beginning
before losing it by manipulating our daughter and I with
visitation, communication, abuses of time and people,
manipulation of the Courts, and various types of contempt, all
creating alienation between our daughter and I.
The abuses against the Child by [Ex-Wife's Name
Redacted] went on throughout the entire case in 2000,
they've been perpetuated by her since the abusive Order of
March, 2009, and I 'm confident she'll continue to harm our
daughter so long as the Court continues to allows her to have
the major portion of the parenting time.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] has abused her discretion
given to her by the Court in denying my visitation with the
available supervisor, Representative Baldasaro, for no valid
reason whatsoever, which has lasted throughout 2009, 2010, and
now well into 2011.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] has manipulated the
Courts. Since the beginning, our daughter's PCP [Primary
Care Provider] complained to my attorney about how the
health and happiness of our daughter was declining during the
period when the parenting schedule was 50/50. We were told by
the clinic to ask the Court for full custody. Approximately
one day after counsel asked the Court to get the child home to
me, [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] somehow alerted the
medical personnel at the Parkland Medical center that I was
touching or contacting my daughter inappropriately. The G.A.L.
at the time said "Oh well, mothers will do that." The Hospital
treated our daughter for her diaper shaped infection, many
months after I already had her potty trained at home.
Approximately one day later, [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted]
was attempting to try the same accusations again at the
Londonderry Police Dept. Lt. Holsworth informed me, " I had to
throw her out of here. She was starting to make accusations
and attempting to get me to finish her statements. Obviously,
she was trying to accuse you of molesting your daughter but
wanted me to make the accusation."
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted], and her counsel,
attempted to get the Court to believe that I was "incubating"
various biological agents in my home to induce infections in
our daughter's body so that I could get her treated on the day
I picked her up or the day after.
My daughter's PCP came to Court three times and gave a fourth
testimony through a deposition to get the child away from the
mother.
My daughter's therapist that was found by [Ex-wife's
Name Redacted] after the divorce decree, who she tried
to use to claim that it was I would not co-parent, came to
court twice to get the child away from the mother for a
plethora of psychological and emotional stresses that she
inflicted against our daughter including but not limited to,
the child's complaints about boyfriend abuse, her mother not
feeding her when she was hungry, "Mommy told me to tell you
that daddy was sleeping naked with me." "Mommy told me to tell
you that daddy wouldn't let me allow Lea to sign my cast."
"Mom's boyfriends yell at my mom." "Mom's boyfriend called me
stupid." "Mom keeps taking the phone away so I can't talk to
my dad."
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] took the Child off her
prophylaxis treatment so many times that the Clinic had to
release our daughter as the PCP told me that their treatment
won't work if [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] doesn't
cooperate.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] took our daughter off her
medication so many times that recurring infections kept coming
until our daughter was no longer treatable with the low
strength antibiotics so she needed to go on nitro-furantoin.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] got the Court to claim
that she disagreed with the medical professionals and that I
wouldn't listen to opposing opinions.
Everytime [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] took our
daughter off the prophylaxis, the new clinics put her back on
the medication, including the doctors who got incomplete
information from [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted].
Nurse Practioner Holt, Dr. Zinnes, Dr. Das, Dr. Hollander,
Dr. Williams, Dr. Chibaro, Nurse Practitioner Romboli, and
those hoodwinked by [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted], Dr.
Cendron and Dr. Aurora both finally agreed to keep the child
on the treatment. The only dissenting opinion was that of [Ex-Wife's
Name Redacted].
A gastroenterologist came up with the cure for the Child,
which [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] didn't want to
follow. We took the child off sugars, high starches, high
fructose corn syrups, and cleared the sources for any
potential infections.
Today, our daughter is still cleared of the problem.
The gastroenterologist made negative comments which were
exaggerated after the NH HealthyKids insurance refused to pay
him and the allergist because Wayne MacDonald of the HHS
caught [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] committing welfare
fraud by claiming the Child lived with her most of the time,
when in fact she lived with me most of the time, so the
coverage was dropped.
Dr. Silverman instructed me to weigh the child in such a way
that she paid it no mind because the child was complaining to
him about not getting fed. Similarly, the school kept calling
me because [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] was sending the
Child to school with no lunch or money.
The Child was going up and down nearly four pounds from one
parent to the other. She was losing the weight while with her
mother.
The Court kept making the false statements that is was me
exposing the Child to litigation while she was having fun
bouncing from scale to scale at the Postal Center as she
laughed at the numbers.
As a result of these abuses and there are many, many more and
the abuses of the G.A.L, who submitted pure hearsay, the March
2009 Order was merely a compilation of
Notably, my "contact" with the medical providers was totally
mischaracterized by [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted]'s
counsel, for instance, it was I who found and paid for the
Child's corrective eyewear with a new doctor. None of the
statements about me in that Order are true.
It's easy to see, Judge Michalik merely echoed Master Cross
and the hearsay from G.A.L. Wechsler which has caused
intolerable damage to our Child and I.
Dr. William Brehm, the HHS Ombudsman can be reached at 603
271 5572 and bbrehm@dhhs.state.nh.us for the information on an
impressive and thorough investigation which will prove beyond
even a shadow of doubt that all points brought forward here by
me are factual and worse than I've stated.
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] has been deceiving the
Court through counsel and her own misrepresentations in an
efficient and effective manner.
The DCYF and HHS Ombudsman's reports from 2005 and 2006 state
many of [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted]'s abuses and
invalidate her claims.
The Motion for Petitioner to submit to Psychological
Evaluation written by me show clearly the pattern of abuses
and violations by [Ex-Wife's Name Redacted].
[Ex-Wife's Name Redacted] is not going to stop these
abuses unless our daughter is taken from her custody.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
New Hampshire, that the foregoing, to the best of my knowledge, is
true, correct and complete.
